Difference between revisions of "Notes:BC1.AH.Colonial Virginia and Maryland charters and conditions"

From Civicwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Jeff moved page Notes:Colonial charters to Notes:JL:Colonial charters without leaving a redirect)
Line 26: Line 26:
 
:*Council for Virginia in England was over all.
 
:*Council for Virginia in England was over all.
 
:*Each 'colony' or 'company' should manage its affairs in England, and
 
:*Each 'colony' or 'company' should manage its affairs in England, and
:*and these to be appointed by king
+
:*these to be appointed by king
 
::*Each plantation had its council in America
 
::*Each plantation had its council in America
::* to be appointed as the king determined.
+
::*to be appointed as the king determined.
This was interesting, but a bit much when considering that the first colonies had difficulty surviving due to conditions that had nothing to do with the king's charter.  But, as Channing points out, they were breaking new ground.  Complete royal oversight was later abandoned in favor of giving more control to the investors who in turn invested partial self-government in the colonists.  But the first colonists to land in Virginia in were to be governed by "Articles and Instructions for the Government of Virginia" issued by James I.   
+
This was interesting, but a bit much when considering that the first colonies had difficulty surviving due to conditions that had nothing to do with the king's charter.  But, as Channing points out, they were breaking new ground.  Complete royal oversight was later abandoned in favor of giving more control to the investors who in turn invested partial self-government in the colonists.  But the first colonists to land in Virginia in were to be governed by "Articles and Instructions for the Government of Virginia" issued by James I.  These instructions went so far as to tell the emigrants how they were to determine a proper site for a plantation.   
 
:*The supreme council had executive, legislative, and judiciary functions.  Its authority was absolute - as was considered necessary due to the high risk nature of the venture.
 
:*The supreme council had executive, legislative, and judiciary functions.  Its authority was absolute - as was considered necessary due to the high risk nature of the venture.
::In hind sight - they would have been better served by granting local autonomy as was later demonstrated in Jamestown.
+
:*An interesting thing to note is that,
 
+
::*while guaranteed English rights, the colonists seem to have been regarded almost as employees to conduct themselves as directed by councils appointed by the king. 
 
+
:::In hind sight - they would have been better served by granting local autonomy as was later demonstrated in Jamestown.
 +
:::The charter for follow three years later provided a higher degree of self-rule.
  
 +
The colonists who travelled to America under this charter met with hardship that ended in the death of the large majority of them. 
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Section
 
{{Section
|HasArticleText=This is the 3rd section
+
|HasArticleText===The Charter of 1609==
 +
 
 +
This was the 2nd Virginia charter.  It went a step further in the granting of self-rule.  In the charter of 1606 (the first Virginia charter), the common stockholders had no say in how the company was to be run.  In this charter, the king placed government of the corporation and its plantations in their hands. 
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Section
 
{{Section

Revision as of 12:41, 17 May 2014



This is the first section


The First Virginia Charter

In 1606 James I issued a patent which is generally cited as the first Virginia Charter[1]. This document is remarkable in several ways. First, it asserts the right of the English king to colonize America between the 34th and 45th parallels - from Cape Fear River to Halifax. These were the southern and northern limits of Virginia - almost the entire eastern seaboard of North America. The Spanish considered Virginia part of the Spanish Indies. James I essentially said - no, we found it, so it's ours.

What is most important about the charter, for our purposes, is its constitutional declarations.

  • In it there is a clause which states that the colonists and their posterity "shall have and enjoy all liberties franchises, and immunities within any of our other dominions, to all intents and purposes as if they had been abiding and born within this our realm of England or any other of our said dominions."
  • James I had previously declared similar rights in the patents given to Walter Ralegh and later to Bartholomew Gilbert.

In these, James established that English colonies would not be like those of France and Spain - or those of any country's colonists before them.

  • English colonists would be considered citizens who enjoyed the protection of English Common Law in the same way as those at home.
  • Historian Edward Channing notes that
  • this is of interest but not highly important since the English king "is under no man, but is under God and the law."
  • And that, "Go where he would, so long as he settled on land claimed by England and acknowledged allegiance to the English crown, the Englishman carried with him as much of the Common Law of England as was applicable to his situation and was not repugnant to his other rights and privileges."[1]
I.e., an Englishman anywhere in the English empire enjoyed the protection of English Common Law and that even the king was ruled by it.
This is a good start on rule of law.

This first charter lacked the self-rule allowances of subsequent charters, but it had a start.

  • Council for Virginia in England was over all.
  • Each 'colony' or 'company' should manage its affairs in England, and
  • these to be appointed by king
  • Each plantation had its council in America
  • to be appointed as the king determined.

This was interesting, but a bit much when considering that the first colonies had difficulty surviving due to conditions that had nothing to do with the king's charter. But, as Channing points out, they were breaking new ground. Complete royal oversight was later abandoned in favor of giving more control to the investors who in turn invested partial self-government in the colonists. But the first colonists to land in Virginia in were to be governed by "Articles and Instructions for the Government of Virginia" issued by James I. These instructions went so far as to tell the emigrants how they were to determine a proper site for a plantation.

  • The supreme council had executive, legislative, and judiciary functions. Its authority was absolute - as was considered necessary due to the high risk nature of the venture.
  • An interesting thing to note is that,
  • while guaranteed English rights, the colonists seem to have been regarded almost as employees to conduct themselves as directed by councils appointed by the king.
In hind sight - they would have been better served by granting local autonomy as was later demonstrated in Jamestown.
The charter for follow three years later provided a higher degree of self-rule.

The colonists who travelled to America under this charter met with hardship that ended in the death of the large majority of them.


The Charter of 1609

This was the 2nd Virginia charter. It went a step further in the granting of self-rule. In the charter of 1606 (the first Virginia charter), the common stockholders had no say in how the company was to be run. In this charter, the king placed government of the corporation and its plantations in their hands.


this is the 4th section



  1. 1.0 1.1 Channing, Edward. A History of The United States Volume I. London: MacMillan & Co., Ltd. 1909. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "Channing_I" defined multiple times with different content