Difference between revisions of "Portal:Inalienable Rights"

From Civicwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Rights is the fun part.)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
     <tr>
 
     <tr>
 
       <td style="padding:5px;">
 
       <td style="padding:5px;">
The proper function of government is to preserve the liberty of the society of people that create it.  Among the legitimate means of doing that are the encoding of laws - which can be thought of as the 'science of liberty'.  Our first set of laws was the Constitution of the United States.    
+
<!--The proper function of government is to preserve the liberty of the society of people that create it.  Among the legitimate means of doing that are the encoding of laws - which can be thought of as the 'science of liberty'.  Our first set of laws was the Constitution of the United States. -->
 +
We use this topic/category to expound on the fundamental rights that are to be protected as the legitimate function of a government.  Let us start by understanding that this is the fun part - the easy part, if you will - though calling it easy is a little like taking it for granted, and it must not be.  There are always those who do not recognize such rights, who will argue against them, and even commit violence against them in the name of principles that are anti-liberty.  So, a discussion of rights seems to us the place to begin, but the road gets steeper as we progress from rights to how they should be preserved.  Preserving rights is what is difficult to get right.  The 18th century was a time of intense activity around the subject of rights and government in America, England, and continental Europe - particularly France.  England got it right, the Unites States of America significantly improved on their example while France failed almost completely.  <br>Let the fun begin!
  
 
The phrase 'inalienable rights' was likely first used in 1725<ref name="Hutcheson">Francis Hutcheson, ''Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue'',  1725</ref><ref> Hutcheson foreshadowed the Declaration of Independence, stating: “For wherever any Invasion is made upon unalienable Rights, there must arise either a perfect, or external Right to Resistance. . . . Unalienable Rights are essential Limitations in all Governments.” </ref>.  It is synonymous with 'natural rights' and 'God given rights'  "Inalienable" means that such rights are immutable - their existence is unconditional.  They can neither be given up by the individual or removed by another.  They can, of course, be violated.
 
The phrase 'inalienable rights' was likely first used in 1725<ref name="Hutcheson">Francis Hutcheson, ''Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue'',  1725</ref><ref> Hutcheson foreshadowed the Declaration of Independence, stating: “For wherever any Invasion is made upon unalienable Rights, there must arise either a perfect, or external Right to Resistance. . . . Unalienable Rights are essential Limitations in all Governments.” </ref>.  It is synonymous with 'natural rights' and 'God given rights'  "Inalienable" means that such rights are immutable - their existence is unconditional.  They can neither be given up by the individual or removed by another.  They can, of course, be violated.
  
This concept of such rights is the foundation of the rule of law - which is the foundation of our government.  Rule of Law is the foundation of all truly successful governments.  England was first to rely on it through its Common Law.  Then America developed it further and placed it at the center of the new government for the United States.  Though both have at times strayed, these governments were set up as guardians of these fundamental rights and the people to whom they belong.
+
This concept of such rights is the foundation of the rule of law - which is the foundation of our government.  That leap from rights to understanding the correct role to be played by law is the crucial ingredient.  Rule of Law is the foundation of all truly successful governments.  England was first to rely on it through its Common Law.  Then America developed it further and placed it at the center of the new government for the United States.  Though both have at times strayed, these governments were set up as guardians of these fundamental rights and the people to whom they belong.
  
 
This portal is the place to assign categories and articless that present and discuss the concept of rights as it concerned colonial Americans, America's founders, and how rights are understood today.   
 
This portal is the place to assign categories and articless that present and discuss the concept of rights as it concerned colonial Americans, America's founders, and how rights are understood today.   

Revision as of 15:29, 3 August 2014

Inalienable Rights

We use this topic/category to expound on the fundamental rights that are to be protected as the legitimate function of a government. Let us start by understanding that this is the fun part - the easy part, if you will - though calling it easy is a little like taking it for granted, and it must not be. There are always those who do not recognize such rights, who will argue against them, and even commit violence against them in the name of principles that are anti-liberty. So, a discussion of rights seems to us the place to begin, but the road gets steeper as we progress from rights to how they should be preserved. Preserving rights is what is difficult to get right. The 18th century was a time of intense activity around the subject of rights and government in America, England, and continental Europe - particularly France. England got it right, the Unites States of America significantly improved on their example while France failed almost completely.
Let the fun begin!

The phrase 'inalienable rights' was likely first used in 1725[1][2]. It is synonymous with 'natural rights' and 'God given rights' "Inalienable" means that such rights are immutable - their existence is unconditional. They can neither be given up by the individual or removed by another. They can, of course, be violated.

This concept of such rights is the foundation of the rule of law - which is the foundation of our government. That leap from rights to understanding the correct role to be played by law is the crucial ingredient. Rule of Law is the foundation of all truly successful governments. England was first to rely on it through its Common Law. Then America developed it further and placed it at the center of the new government for the United States. Though both have at times strayed, these governments were set up as guardians of these fundamental rights and the people to whom they belong.

This portal is the place to assign categories and articless that present and discuss the concept of rights as it concerned colonial Americans, America's founders, and how rights are understood today.

Candidate article subjects:

  • The philosophical foundation for the concept of rights
    • Aristotle, Locke, etc.
    • How are such rights reconciled with society and government?
  • America's Common Law Heritage
  • 'Rule of Law' explained
  • Papers, letters, and pamphlets in 18th century America that dealt with rights (These can also be assigned to American Independence)
  • Rights as defined in our constitution and its amendments (These can also be assigned to Federalism and Democracy.)
  • Other definition of 'rights' used in the American political discussion and their legitimacy.
For example: FDR's 2nd Bill of Rights.


  1. Francis Hutcheson, Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue, 1725
  2. Hutcheson foreshadowed the Declaration of Independence, stating: “For wherever any Invasion is made upon unalienable Rights, there must arise either a perfect, or external Right to Resistance. . . . Unalienable Rights are essential Limitations in all Governments.”
Inalienable rights.jpg

Categories and contents

Click on arrows to see subcategories and articles.
Article titles are in italics.

Things you can do

  • Improve the introduction above (text and image).
    • recommend a better image to represent the portal.
  • Edit the page Inalienable Rights.
 

TBD

  • TBD 1
  • TBD 2