Virginia and Maryland - the early years
From 1606, the year of the first Virginia Charter, to about 1660, the eastern seaboard had a number of thriving English colonies stretching from Newport News to the Penobscot River – though still sparsely populated. In 1660 the English Colonies had a population approaching 80,000, plus another 6 or 7 thousand in the Dutch colonies. In 1660 representative government had a strong foothold in the English colonies, though the early charters promised it not. There was much more religious tolerance than at home in England, though not in the realm of politics and Government. Nonconformance was prohibited in most charters. A single established church was still the norm. By 1660, survival in the colonies had become more certain than in the early days in which the odds were fearsome. Yet, even when the chances of survival were around 30%, the English kept coming. 2014/07/03 User:Jeff
From 1606, the year of the first Virginia Charter, to about 1660, the eastern seaboard had a number of thriving English colonies stretching from Newport News to the Penobscot River – though still sparsely populated. In 1660 the English Colonies had a population approaching 80,000[1] [2]plus another 6 or 7 thousand in the Dutch colonies. In 1660 representative government had a strong foothold in the English colonies, though the early charters promised it not. There was much more religious tolerance than at home in England, though not in the realm of politics and Government. Nonconformance was prohibited in most charters. A single established church was still the norm. By 1660, survival in the colonies had become more certain than in the early days in which the odds were fearsome. Yet, even when the chances of survival were around 30%, the English kept coming.
The Virginia Charters of 1606 and 1609
The Charter of 1606
In 1606 James I issued a patent usually cited as the first Virginia Charter. This document is remarkable for what it says about the English and their colonies.
- It asserts the right of the English king to colonize America between the 34th and 45th parallels – from the Cape Fear River to Halifax. These were the southern and northern limits of Virginia – almost the entire eastern seaboard of North America. The Spanish considered Virginia part of the Spanish Indies, which were islands in the Caribbean. James I essentially said – no, we found it, so it’s ours. And that seems to have been the end of it.
More importantly for our purposes is its establishment of the rights of the English colonists.
- In this charter there is a clause which states that the colonists and their posterity “shall have and enjoy all liberties, franchises, and immunities within any of our other dominions, to all intents and purposes as if they had been abiding and born within this our realm of England or any other of our said dominions.”
- James I had previously declared similar rights in the patents given to Walter Ralegh and later to Bartholomew Gilbert. Such a clause also appeared in subsequent charters.
James thus established that English colonies would be unlike the colonies of other countries – notably those of France and Spain.
- English colonists would be considered subjects of the king and citizens who enjoyed the protection of English common Law in the same way as those at home.
- Historian Edward Channing notes that "Go where he would, so long as he settled on land claimed by England and acknowledged allegiance to the English crown, the Englishman carried with him as much of the Common Law of England as was applicable to his situation and was not repugnant to his other rights and privileges."[1]
- Further, most English had ceased to see the king as divinely ordained.
- Henry of Bracton, a prominent English jurist of the 13th century, wrote that the king "is under no man, but is under God and the law." This quote is from the writings of, an English jurist of the 13th century famous for his writings on law, particularly De Legibus et Consuetudinibus Angliae ("On the Laws and Customs of England") who, among other writings argued that a ruler was king only as he obtained and exercised power in a lawful manner - i.e., he placed law above king - which is, of course, what Magna Charta was about.
These two points are remarkable in that, together, they provide a fair approximation to the rule of law – the central concept of the Constitution of the United States.
