Topics and synopses - Revision history

Jeff at 18:14, 8 September 2015

2015-09-08T18:14:38Z

Jeff: inserted wealth and poverty

2015-09-08T18:13:23Z

inserted wealth and poverty

Jeff at 18:05, 8 September 2015

2015-09-08T18:05:44Z

Jeff at 17:57, 8 September 2015

2015-09-08T17:57:10Z

Jeff at 17:46, 8 September 2015

2015-09-08T17:46:19Z

Jeff: Create the page

2015-09-08T17:23:06Z

Create the page

New page

"Underlying all human regulation were the rights of man and the fundamental law. Government was an attempt to work the machinery of society in conformity with these underlying obligations. A constitution was an effort to set down in writing the most important of these rules. By it the people conferred authority upon governors, judges, and assemblies, and also limited it. . . . So long as the people were in the colonial condition , their laws and the decisions of their courts had been reviewed in England . . . The people of the STates were, therefore, accustomed to a written organic law, and to a fundamental law explanatory of it. . . . Thus there came into being four distinct laws: the political theory at the basis of human society, the fundamental law which was no other than the Common Law of England, the written state constitution, and the laws made by the legislature; their authority was in precisely this order."(chapter XIV<ref name"HOTUS3">Channing, Edward ''History of the United States Vol III'' New York ; The MacMillan Co (1920) </ref>)

==Inalienable Rights==
Inalienable Rights discusses the underlying political theory--that 'all men are created equal' and are endowed with the right to life, liberty, and property. In addition to our own Declaration of independence, there were a number of influential writers in the 18th century that shaped both English and American political theory.
Inalienable Rights is the discussion of that theory.

==America's Heritage==
History of the most relevant events and historical trends that shaped American political thought leading up to the revolutionary war. Most of it will come from the colonial time period, but not all--since our early political thought was
directly descended from the evolution of liberty in England and the English Common Law.

==Independence==
Independence from England was an idea that gathered momentum slowly at first. At the time of the battle of Bunker Hill, Americans were still thinking in terms of asserting their rights as British subjects, not as independent states. There was tipping point at which all thought turned to independence. This is a discussion of how that happened and matured.

This section could be combined with the previous into 'America's Heritage and Independence' since there is some overlap which could cause confusion about where to place articles.

==Liberty and Constitution==
For Civicwiki, this section and the two that follow are the heart of the matter. The previous three are background material.

<references />

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:14, 8 September 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:

−	"Underlying all human regulation were the rights of man and the fundamental law. Government was an attempt to work the machinery of society in conformity with these underlying obligations. A constitution was an effort to set down in writing the most important of these rules. By it the people conferred authority upon governors, judges, and assemblies, and also limited it. . . . So long as the people were in the colonial condition , their laws and the decisions of their courts had been reviewed in England . . . The people of the ~~STates~~ were, therefore, accustomed to a written organic law, and to a fundamental law explanatory of it. . . . Thus there came into being four distinct laws: the political theory at the basis of human society, the fundamental law which was no other than the Common Law of England, the written state constitution, and the laws made by the legislature; their authority was in precisely this order."(chapter XIV<ref name"HOTUS3">Channing, Edward ''History of the United States Vol III'' New York ; The MacMillan Co (1920) </ref>)	+	"Underlying all human regulation were the rights of man and the fundamental law. Government was an attempt to work the machinery of society in conformity with these underlying obligations. A constitution was an effort to set down in writing the most important of these rules. By it the people conferred authority upon governors, judges, and assemblies, and also limited it. . . . So long as the people were in the colonial condition , their laws and the decisions of their courts had been reviewed in England . . . The people of the States were, therefore, accustomed to a written organic law, and to a fundamental law explanatory of it. . . . Thus there came into being four distinct laws: the political theory at the basis of human society, the fundamental law which was no other than the Common Law of England, the written state constitution, and the laws made by the legislature; their authority was in precisely this order."(chapter XIV<ref name"HOTUS3">Channing, Edward ''History of the United States Vol III'' New York ; The MacMillan Co (1920) </ref>)

	==Inalienable Rights==		==Inalienable Rights==

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:13, 8 September 2015
Line 36:		Line 36:

	Articles in this section discuss economic freedom and what it means.		Articles in this section discuss economic freedom and what it means.
		+
		+	'''Also in this section is this subsection:'''
		+	===Wealth and Poverty===
		+	'''Wealth is superior to riches'''
		+
		+	There is a difference between wealth and riches that honest politics must understand if it is to avoid destroying both. If it does not understand it, government will end up not by redistributing wealth, but by redistributing poverty.

	==What Government do We Want==		==What Government do We Want==

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 ==Independence==
-'''''When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them . . .'''''
+'''''When in the Course of human events,''''' <br>''it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them . . .''
 Independence from England was an idea that gathered momentum slowly at first.  At the time of the battle of Bunker Hill, Americans were still thinking in terms of asserting their rights as British subjects, not as independent states.  There was tipping point at which all thought turned to independence.  This is a discussion of how that happened and matured.
@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 ==Liberty and Constitution==
-'''The guarantee of liberty through the Rule of Law.'''
+'''The guarantee of liberty through Rule of Law.'''
 For Civicwiki, this section and the two that follow are the heart of the matter.  The previous three are background material.

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 ==Inalienable Rights==
 Inalienable Rights discusses the underlying political theory--that 'all men are created equal' and are endowed with the right to life, liberty, and property.  In addition to our own Declaration of independence, there were a number of influential writers in the 18th century that shaped both English and American political theory.
 Inalienable Rights is the discussion of that theory.
 ==America's Heritage==
 History of the most relevant events  and historical trends that shaped American political thought leading up to the revolutionary war.  Most of it will come from the colonial time period, but not all--since our early political thought was
 directly descended from the evolution of liberty in England and the English Common Law.
 ==Independence==
 Independence from England was an idea that gathered momentum slowly at first.  At the time of the battle of Bunker Hill, Americans were still thinking in terms of asserting their rights as British subjects, not as independent states.  There was tipping point at which all thought turned to independence.  This is a discussion of how that happened and matured.
@@ Line 16: / Line 22: @@
 ==Liberty and Constitution==
 For Civicwiki, this section and the two that follow are the heart of the matter.  The previous three are background material.
@@ Line 23: / Line 31: @@
 ==Economic Freedom==
-The most fundamental kind of freedom.  Though most early Americans thought in terms of political freedom, It was infringements on economic freedom that set them off.  Indeed, political freedom in the absence of economic freedom is an oxymoron.  Political freedoms must be accompanied by a like amount of economic freedom.  On the other hand, it is possible to have economic freedom in an environment of restricted political freedom--and there have been instances of such in recent history (but not in America).
+'''The most fundamental kind of freedom.'''
 Articles in this section discuss economic freedom and what it means.
 ==What Government do We Want==
-Classic Liberalism vs. Progressivism.
+'''Classic Liberalism vs. Progressivism.'''
-Classic Liberalism is the political theory that guided the creation of the U.S.--the theory that says that men are endowed with certain unalienable rights.  That government is a necessary evil and society should tolerate only as much government as is needed to guarantee those rights.
+This is the chapter that comes at the end of a book that tries to bring closure to all the points that the book is trying to make.  In light of everything that has been said in the articles of the previous 5 topics, how should we want our government to behave?
-Progressivism views government not as a necessary evil, but as a force for good.  That government is the source of rights and rights are as many and as generous as the government determines.
+Classic Liberalism is the political theory that guided the creation of the U.S.--the theory that says that men are endowed with certain unalienable rights.  That government is a necessary evil and society should tolerate only as much government as is needed to guarantee those rights.  Classic liberalism is not traditional conservatism, but is commonly confused with it.
-This is like the chapter that comes at the end of a book that tries to bring closure to all the points that the book is trying to make.  In light of everything that has been said in the articles of the previous 5 topics, how should we want our government to behave?
+Progressivism views government not as a necessary evil, but as a force for good.  This view holds that individual rights are not 'inalienable', but are created by government; and that a benevolent and powerful state can eliminate the economic imbalances created by our rapid industrialization and advance of technology. The constitution's limits on government power were seen as barriers to righting social problems that classic liberalism does not address.
 <references />