Difference between revisions of "Category:Wealth and Poverty"
m |
m |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[File:DSCN0879 wealth and poverty.JPG|350px|thumb|link=]] | [[File:DSCN0879 wealth and poverty.JPG|350px|thumb|link=]] | ||
− | So, what is wealth? <!--CW presents its understanding and it is that which we speak of here. --> | + | So, what is wealth? |
+ | <!--CW presents its understanding and it is that which we speak of here. --> | ||
It will be helpful to say what it isn't. | It will be helpful to say what it isn't. | ||
− | <br>It is easy to confound wealth and money and most of us do. They are not the same. A lot of gold makes you rich, but not necessarily wealthy. Gold (or cash) is a static asset. You can use it to buy things, but it creates nothing unless it is used to enable assets that do produce wealth. Once spent for consumption, nothing is left behind to generate a continuing stream of spending power. | + | <br>It is easy to confound wealth and money and most of us do. They are not the same. A lot of gold makes you rich, but not necessarily wealthy. Gold (or cash) is a static asset. You can use it to buy things, but it creates nothing unless it is used to enable assets that do produce wealth. Once spent for consumption, nothing is left behind to generate a continuing stream of spending power. :George Gilder<ref name="Wealth and Poverty">Gilder, George. ''Wealth and Poverty''. New York. Basic Books, Inc. 1981</ref> uses the illustration of oil rich countries. Several countries with the highest per-capita spending power are in the middle east. Their spending power comes from their oil assets. They can buy Rolls Royces, private Boeings, and erect office buildings. But those are perishable things which, in themselves, generate no further income unless there are roads on which to drive and skilled people to use the offices, and unless they are put to use in wealth generating ways. When the oil is gone, those countries could become as poor as they were before the oil was discovered. They have more riches than wealth. Venezuela is an example - a formerly rich country, much of which came from oil, voted in a government that confiscated the country's wealth producing assets as well as their oil fields and drove out the people that knew how to employ them as generators of wealth. Formerly rich, Venezuela has recently imposed rationing for food and daily necessities. Russia relies heavily on its oil assets for revenue and finds itself in a bind as the price of oil falls. Countries like England, Germany, Japan, the U.S., and others have wealth generating assets that relegate whatever oil assets they may (or may not) have to supporting roles. |
− | + | <br>Wealth is a product of human thought and effort acting on the material world. | |
− | :George Gilder<ref name="Wealth and Poverty">Gilder, George. ''Wealth and Poverty''. New York. Basic Books, Inc. 1981</ref> uses the illustration of oil rich countries. Several countries with the highest per-capita spending power are in the middle east. Their spending power comes from their oil assets. They can buy Rolls Royces, private Boeings, and erect office buildings. But those are perishable things which, in themselves, generate no further income unless there are roads on which to drive and skilled people to use the offices, and unless they are put to use in wealth generating ways. When the oil is gone, those countries could become as poor as they were before the oil was discovered. They have more riches than wealth. Venezuela is an example - a formerly rich country, much of which came from oil, voted in a government that confiscated the country's wealth producing assets as well as their oil fields and drove out the people that knew how to employ them as generators of wealth. Formerly rich, Venezuela has recently imposed rationing for food and daily necessities. Russia relies heavily on its oil assets for revenue and finds itself in a bind as the price of oil falls. Countries like England, Germany, Japan, the U.S., and others have wealth generating assets that relegate whatever oil assets they may (or may not) have to supporting roles. | ||
Wealth is having the kind of enduring assets and capacities (work skills, schools, industries, roads, ports, airports, railroads, and a robust and honest society willing to work) that will generate future income and perpetuate wealth. | Wealth is having the kind of enduring assets and capacities (work skills, schools, industries, roads, ports, airports, railroads, and a robust and honest society willing to work) that will generate future income and perpetuate wealth. | ||
+ | Wealth is a society that protects the fundamental human rights. | ||
:Wealth can exist long before the presence of riches. Consider a person like Steve Jobs. He was not lucky, he had the assets of wealth before he was rich. His assets were useful knowledge, the vision to use it, the capacity to work for that vision, faith in the market place with no guarantee of success, and a government that guaranteed him the freedom to create something that we did not know we needed until he presented it to us. There are millions of other such examples created by more ordinary Americans who started from nothing and built their own futures - or maybe started with something and built something bigger. These are stories of wealth. There is a little truth to adage that "it takes money to make money", but it would be completely untrue to say that it takes money to create wealth. Let's talk about this within this topic. | :Wealth can exist long before the presence of riches. Consider a person like Steve Jobs. He was not lucky, he had the assets of wealth before he was rich. His assets were useful knowledge, the vision to use it, the capacity to work for that vision, faith in the market place with no guarantee of success, and a government that guaranteed him the freedom to create something that we did not know we needed until he presented it to us. There are millions of other such examples created by more ordinary Americans who started from nothing and built their own futures - or maybe started with something and built something bigger. These are stories of wealth. There is a little truth to adage that "it takes money to make money", but it would be completely untrue to say that it takes money to create wealth. Let's talk about this within this topic. | ||
Poverty can be thought of as lacking that which is wealth. | Poverty can be thought of as lacking that which is wealth. |
Revision as of 18:08, 8 January 2015
This is the category Wealth and Poverty.
Wealth and Poverty
One way to understand American success is to look at its wealth and where it came from and it's poverty and why it exists. Both wealth and poverty are badly misunderstood, which is a problem for honest politics. To understand them is to strengthen our basis for making intelligent political decisions and dispersing the fog of political marketing.
So, what is wealth?
It will be helpful to say what it isn't.
Poverty can be thought of as lacking that which is wealth.
Viewing poverty only as the absence of wealth also denies us the understanding to be gained by looking at the coin from both sides. Just as understanding wealth helps to understand poverty, understanding poverty provides insights into creating wealth and it dispels some of the myth that surrounds both. Articles for this categoryThis category is the place to insert articles about
including their nature and their role in American success or lack of it.
|
Things you can do
|
TBD
|
Subcategories
This category has the following 2 subcategories, out of 2 total.