Difference between revisions of "Category:Wealth and Poverty"
m |
m |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:Okay. That is too simplistic. One would not say that oil rich middle eastern countries are living in poverty. But, having riches rather than enduring wealth assets, they could slip back into poverty in the future if they are not able to transition to non-perishable income producing assets - all of which depend on knowledge, work, and a few other things that will be discussed in the articles assigned to this category. | :Okay. That is too simplistic. One would not say that oil rich middle eastern countries are living in poverty. But, having riches rather than enduring wealth assets, they could slip back into poverty in the future if they are not able to transition to non-perishable income producing assets - all of which depend on knowledge, work, and a few other things that will be discussed in the articles assigned to this category. | ||
− | Viewing poverty only as the absence of wealth denies us the understanding to be gained by looking at the coin from both sides. Just as understanding wealth helps to understand poverty, understanding poverty provides insights into creating wealth and it dispels some of the myth that surrounds both. Just as wealth is more than simply having money, poverty is more than simply not having it. You do not lift someone out of poverty by providing them with unearned money. You can pay their rent and buy their groceries, but they remain in poverty until they are able to create sufficient wealth to pay their own bills. | + | Viewing poverty only as the absence of wealth denies us the understanding to be gained by looking at the coin from both sides. Just as understanding wealth helps to understand poverty, understanding poverty provides insights into creating wealth and it dispels some of the myth that surrounds both. Just as wealth is more than simply having money, poverty is more than simply not having it. You do not lift someone out of poverty by providing them with unearned money. You can pay their rent and buy their groceries, but they remain in poverty until they are able to create sufficient wealth to pay their own bills. It can be argued that, rather than eliminating structural poverty, welfare creates it where it may not have existed, by removing a welfare recipient's financial incentive to use their own modest wealth creating abilities. |
<!-- note: Government policy that provides unearned money created 'bad actors' by disincentivizing. Charitable organizations, such as churches, inherently understand this. They would end charity to someone who resisted becoming self sufficient though otherwise able, or who spent their charity income on bad behavior. --> | <!-- note: Government policy that provides unearned money created 'bad actors' by disincentivizing. Charitable organizations, such as churches, inherently understand this. They would end charity to someone who resisted becoming self sufficient though otherwise able, or who spent their charity income on bad behavior. --> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:17, 1 November 2015
This is the category Wealth and Poverty.
Wealth and Poverty
One way to understand American success is to look at its wealth, its poverty, and the nature of both. America has been unequaled in its ability to generate wealth and overcome poverty. Both wealth and poverty are badly misunderstood, which is a problem for honest politics. To understand them is to strengthen our basis for making intelligent political decisions and dispersing the fog of political marketing.
So, what is wealth? We'll start by drawing a distinction between wealth and riches.
Real wealth is in the morale and ingenuity of people. It is a product of human thought and effort acting on the material world. It is having the kind of enduring assets and capacities (work skills, schools, industries, roads, ports, airports, railroads, and an economically free, robust and honest society willing to work) that will generate future income and perpetuate wealth. Wealth is a society that protects the fundamental human rights.
Poverty can be thought of as lacking that which is wealth.
Viewing poverty only as the absence of wealth denies us the understanding to be gained by looking at the coin from both sides. Just as understanding wealth helps to understand poverty, understanding poverty provides insights into creating wealth and it dispels some of the myth that surrounds both. Just as wealth is more than simply having money, poverty is more than simply not having it. You do not lift someone out of poverty by providing them with unearned money. You can pay their rent and buy their groceries, but they remain in poverty until they are able to create sufficient wealth to pay their own bills. It can be argued that, rather than eliminating structural poverty, welfare creates it where it may not have existed, by removing a welfare recipient's financial incentive to use their own modest wealth creating abilities. A related subject is income inequality - a hot topic of today. Inequality is misunderstood just as wealth and poverty are misunderstood and for the same reasons. Articles for this categoryThis category is the place to insert articles about
including their nature and their role in American success or lack of it. |
Things you can do
ContentsClick on arrows to see subcategories and articles.
|
TBD
|
Subcategories
This category has the following 2 subcategories, out of 2 total.